“Territorial taxation” sounds like a simple rule: what comes from outside stays free. In application it is a set of connecting factors, and at least two of them are routinely missed. Rather than restate the rule abstractly once more, we work it through six cases.
What actually counts
The source is decided by the facts: where a service is performed, who pays for it, and what the payment comes from. The bank account does not appear on that list — it is irrelevant to the classification.
Six cases
| Case | Classification | What it turns on |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution from a US LLC to a person resident in Georgia | points to foreign source | The paying entity is foreign and the value is created outside. |
| Software development carried out in Tbilisi, client in Germany the most underestimated case | points to Georgian source | The service is physically performed in Georgia. Where the client sits does not change that. |
| Capital gain from a foreign securities account | points to foreign source | No Georgian connecting factor — neither issuer nor custody nor activity. |
| Interest from a Georgian bank in the same account as foreign income, but a different case for tax | points to Georgian source | For interest, the residence of the payer is a connecting factor. |
| Rent from a flat in Batumi | Georgian source | Immovable property in the country — the clearest case there is. |
| Consulting fee earned while travelling outside Georgia | points to foreign source | Neither the place of performance nor the payer has a Georgian nexus — documenting the travel dates carries the classification here. |
Why the wording says “points to”
Because the classification turns on the individual case, and the authority’s practice is part of the answer. Anyone treating one of these constellations as settled because it appears in a table has misread the table. What it does deliver: it shows which question to ask in your case — and that it is never the question about the account.
For the cases where the answer matters, there is the advance ruling; how it works and what it costs is set out in Advance rulings in Georgia.
The precondition behind all of it
All six cases presuppose that you are tax-resident in Georgia. Without that residence the source question is secondary for Georgia — the state where you are resident decides instead, and it generally does not apply territorial taxation at all.
Territorial taxation — frequently asked
Does the account decide the source?
No, and that is the most widespread misunderstanding. Where a payment arrives is irrelevant to the source. What governs are the underlying facts and the statutory connecting factors — for services above all the place where the work is performed.
I work in Tbilisi for clients abroad. Is that foreign source?
This is where it gets tight. If the service is physically performed in Georgia, much points to a Georgian source, even where the client sits abroad and pays in foreign currency. This constellation belongs examined rather than assumed — it is the most common point of dispute.
What about interest from a Georgian bank?
For interest, the residence of the payer is a connecting factor. Interest from a Georgian bank is therefore not simply equivalent to foreign interest, even where both land in the same account.
Can I have the classification settled bindingly?
Yes, through an advance ruling. It binds the authority to the assessment given as long as the facts realised match those submitted — and it is the only way to settle a contested classification in advance.
This article is general information and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Classifying income by source depends on the individual case and on administrative practice. As at August 2026.
Sources
Every legal statement in this article is backed by the primary source listed below.
- Tax Code of Georgia, Art. 82 (exempt income) and Art. 104 (Georgian-source income) — Georgian original with version selector
- Revenue Service Georgia — advance rulings and filing practice