An account freeze gives no warning. The card is declined, the transfer sits there, and the hotline says it cannot comment — which is not an excuse but the law. This article explains the mechanism behind the freeze, how long it may last, what rights you actually have, and why a second account in another jurisdiction is not a hiding place but simply redundancy.
What actually happens
The sequence is governed by a handful of sections in the German Money Laundering Act (Geldwäschegesetz, GwG), and it runs in this order.
-
Monitoring triggers
Banks run automated transaction monitoring. It does not examine content but patterns: unusual amounts, cross-border payments, rapid onward transfers, cash deposits, crypto exposure — and above all deviations from the account holder’s established behaviour.
-
The bank reports to the FIU
If the hit hardens, a reporting duty arises under section 43(1) GwG. The addressee is the Financial Intelligence Unit at the customs authority. The threshold is deliberately low: reporting is triggered by indications, not by evidence.
-
The transaction sits
Under section 46(1) GwG a reported transaction may be executed at the earliest once the FIU or the public prosecutor consents — or once the third business day after filing has passed without a prohibition being issued.
-
You are told nothing
In parallel, section 47(1) GwG applies: the prohibition on disclosure. The bank may inform you neither about the report nor about any proceedings opened as a result. It may not even hint at the reason.
The interplay of the last two steps produces the experience affected customers routinely describe as arbitrary: something happens, nobody says what, and the person on the phone is not being unhelpful but is legally bound.
The tipping-off prohibition is the real core. It exists for a comprehensible reason — anyone who is warned moves assets before they can be traced. It simply does not only catch the cases it was designed for. It catches everyone whose payment behaviour resembles a pattern.
What this means in practice
One distinction matters, and it is almost always blurred in press coverage: a transaction hold and an account freeze are not the same thing.
The transaction hold under section 46 GwG concerns the reported payment. It is limited by statute and ends with consent or with the expiry of the period.
A full freeze of the account is something else. It is not an automatic consequence of the report but a separate decision by the bank based on its own due-diligence obligations. And that is exactly where the leverage lies for those affected: a full freeze must be proportionate. It may not indiscriminately capture funds that evidently have nothing to do with the reported transaction.
In practice it often goes differently, because the bank minimises its own risk when in doubt. That is the point at which a procedural step becomes an economic problem: anyone running their operations through a single account comes to a standstill during a full freeze. Wages, rent, suppliers, direct debits — everything depends on one institution whose risk decision you neither know nor can influence.
Why redundancy is the actual subject
An unspectacular consequence follows from the mechanism. If a freeze can in principle hit anyone, without warning and without a stated reason, then the relevant question is not how to prevent it. It is what happens while it runs.
A business with two banking relationships in two legal systems stays operative during that period. One with a single banking relationship does not. This is the same reasoning nobody questions when it comes to server locations or suppliers — with bank accounts it is strangely rarely applied.
Georgia is suitable for this for four sober reasons:
- Different legal system: Georgian banks are supervised by the National Bank of Georgia, not by BaFin
- Multi-currency: GEL, EUR and USD in one account, IBAN provided
- Deposit protection of GEL 50,000 per institution — up to GEL 200,000 across four banks
- Remote opening by power of attorney is possible, no travel required
- No SEPA — EUR runs through correspondent banks, one to two business days
- No direct debits: unsuitable as your only operating account inside Europe
- No protection from reporting: Georgia has reported balances and income under CRS since 2024
- No protection from investigation: mutual legal assistance exists, an account never replaces clean provenance
The four points on the “no” side are there deliberately. A Georgian account is a second relationship, not a replacement and certainly not a hiding place. Anyone being sold it as the latter should change provider. The reporting mechanism is described in detail in CRS and Georgia, the account opening process in Open a Bank Account in Georgia.
What follows from this
Three things, in this order.
First: expect the freeze to arrive without an explanation. Not because the bank is uncooperative but because section 47 GwG requires it to stay silent. Knowing that saves days in an emergency that would otherwise be lost on phone calls.
Second: work out how many days your business would survive a full freeze. That number is usually smaller than assumed — and it is the only metric that really counts in this question.
Third: build the second relationship while nothing has happened. Opening an account during an active freeze is considerably harder, because every bank asks about existing account relationships during onboarding. The right moment is the uneventful one.
How far state access to a foreign account actually reaches — and where the widespread promises depart from the legal position — is set out in Account Seizure: How Far Enforcement Really Reaches.
Frequently asked questions
Why will my bank not tell me why the account is frozen?
Because section 47(1) GwG forbids it. The so-called tipping-off prohibition bars the bank from informing the customer about a filed suspicious activity report or about any investigation opened as a result. The person on the phone may not even know — and if they do, they are not allowed to say. This is not poor service but a statutory duty backed by sanctions.
How long may a transaction be held?
Under section 46(1) GwG a reported transaction may be executed at the earliest once the FIU or the public prosecutor has consented, or once the third business day after filing has passed. Importantly, the clock starts with the report, not with your complaint. A full freeze of the entire account going beyond that is not an automatic consequence but a separate decision by the bank, and it must be proportionate.
Are accounts frozen for being politically inconvenient?
There is no basis for that in the mechanism of the Money Laundering Act. Automated transaction monitoring evaluates payment patterns — amounts, frequencies, recipient countries, cash and crypto exposure, deviations from previous account behaviour. Opinions are not a trigger. Anyone presenting the freeze as a sanction on convictions is describing something other than the applicable law.
What can I do about a disproportionate freeze?
The civil courts are open to you, including interim relief. A full freeze must be proportionate and may not indiscriminately capture funds that evidently have nothing to do with the reported transaction. In addition, section 31 of the Payment Accounts Act gives consumers a right to a basic account. The problem is rarely the law but the duration: weeks to months pass before a decision arrives.
Does a Georgian account protect against a freeze in Germany?
No, and that is not its purpose. A Georgian account changes nothing about a German bank’s decision on a German account. What it provides is the ability to act during the freeze: a second banking relationship in a different legal system through which ongoing payments can continue. That is redundancy, not a shield.
Does a Georgian account stay invisible to the German tax office?
No. Georgia implemented the Common Reporting Standard in 2023, automatic exchange has been running since 2024 and takes place annually. Balances and income are reported to your home authority. Foreign accounts and income must be declared at home in any case. Anyone selling accounts as a hiding place is selling a risk.
This article is general information and does not constitute legal or tax advice. The legal references relate to sections 43, 46 and 47 of the German Money Laundering Act (GwG) and section 31 of the Payment Accounts Act (ZKG) as in force at the time of writing. Foreign accounts and income must be declared in your home country. As of June 2026, subject to changes in the law.